Book Review: sew What! Skirts

0 Comments

I’m being asked a lot now about how to learn to sew, and considering that my method, although optimal (get my mommy to show you) is somewhat impractical to recreate, I’ve been checking out gateway-drug, I indicate introductory, sewing books.

Sew What! Skirts looked good from the get-go, and I wasn’t disappointed.

It’s not just that several of the skirts offer pockets (albeit basic patch ones), or that the idea is to learn fitting techniques that you can apply across multiple (patternless) skirts, or that rickrack features prominently. It’s that I think that the authors (Francesca Denhartog & Carole Ann Camp) have figured out what motivates beginning sewists: it’s the fabric, stupid.

Fabric is what draws folks in. It’s the pledge of taking that stunning yardage and draping it around oneself (or one’s home) that leads people down the path towards the $7000 Bernina. and in every home-ec horror story I’ve ever heard, the indignity of having to make something useless has been compounded by the useless thing having to be done in boring, hideous, low-cost fabric.

The fabrics shown in this book are, frankly, awesome. stunning patterns, charming weaves; not a scratchy double-knit in the lot. The skirts are wearable, the instructions clear.

This is a very good book for beginners, in that it describes *everything*. The instructions stop just short of including “Inhale. Exhale.” They also, bless them, allow for the possibility that you might screw up, and screw up badly. They encourage you to leave extra seam allowances so that you can fix your mistakes, for example, and tell you to start with cotton, as it’s easier.

Lately I’ve been feeling a bit guilty about some of my sewing cheerleading — I’m anxious that I’m making it sound too easy, and that I’ve forgotten how hard it was for me to learn some techniques — things I could do backwards in a hailstorm now, but which occasioned lots of lonely hours with a seam ripper before. part of that disappointment was me being an impatient teenager, sure, but part also is just doing and doing and doing until you can feel when you have something right. This book has a little of the same cheerleading problem, but considering that it’s at such a basic level, and advocating a do-your-own-thing, “it’s not a flaw, it’s an interesting design decision” attitude, I feel as if it’s warranted. The only change I would have made would be to emphasize a lot more the need for practice.

Sewing, I’ve come to realize, is a lot a lot more like athletics than I’d like to admit. despite having been, at one time or another, a cross-country runner (slowly), a college soccer player (ineptly, and inept in Div III at that), and a discus and shotput thrower (not very far, and not for very long), and despite my obsession with roller-skating, I think of myself as profoundly unathletic. So the realization that sewing, like other muscle-memory activities, is something that you just can’t read a book on and be note-perfect at, was one that was slow to come to me. But, just as you don’t have to train for a marathon to take pleasure in running for exercise (shudder), you don’t have to practice couture techniques to make a perfectly charming skirt. All you have to do is practice, period. Those practice runs are still exercise, even if they aren’t marathons, and those practice garments are still wearable — and if you are individual and follow the instructions in this book, they’ll be better than wearable.

So: this is a good book, especially for beginning sewers. fabric is good. Experimentation is good. You (too) can be good. Take it to heart, and take your heart to the sewing machine.

Share this:
Twitter
Facebook

Like this:
Like Loading…

Related

The dress A Day guide to learning To Sew: part OneFebruary 5, 2008
Ten things I’m going to Make just As soon As I get around To ItDecember 11, 2008With 64 comments
Moths in the Pocketbook [caution: long entry]July 2, 2007


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *